WHEN THREE POWERS LOCK ARMS: IS THIS A COLLECTIVE DICTATORSHIP?
I. THE SHOCK THAT UNFOLDED TODAY
Today, the nation witnessed what few thought possible.
The Blue Ribbon Committee, chaired by Sen. Marcoleta, through Mr. Discaya’s confession, named House Speaker Martin Romualdez and Rep. Zaldy Co as allegedly involved in infrastructure kickbacks of 25% on projects under insertions or unprogrammed funds.
The House was exposed.
But what happened next stunned the country: instead of the House absorbing the blow, it was the Senate that bled. In a sudden and almost smooth shift, Sen. Chiz Escudero was removed as Senate President—replaced by Sen. Tito Sotto, backed by 15 votes.
II. THE UNSEEN ANGLE: WHO’S REALLY HOSTAGE HERE?
Why did the Senate take the fall when it was the House under fire? My intuition pushes a different reading: what if Escudero, and even Estrada, were also politically taken hostage? Remember the murmurs linking both names to budget insertions? If so, were there concessions brokered behind closed doors? Who promised what? Which interests were protected? And what loyalties now define the Senate’s new leadership bloc?
Traditionally, a change of Senate leadership signals a change of institutional posture. What was once a chamber of inquiry now risks aligning seamlessly with House and Malacañang.
III. WHEN THREE POWERS BECOME ONE
In a healthy democracy, the executive, legislative, and judicial branches check each other. But when Malacañang, the House, and now the Senate march in lockstep, the balance is compromised.
This is not yet literal dictatorship, since elections remain, and rules still stand. But functionally, it begins to look the same:
- Power concentrated in a few hands.
- Dissent minimized, even punished.
- Institutions stripped of independence.
That’s not democracy—it’s a collective dictatorship wearing democratic clothes.
IV. HISTORY SPEAKS—AND WARNS
We’ve seen this before:
- Marcos Sr.’s Martial Law retained the trappings of democracy—Congress existed, courts functioned, but all bowed to Malacañang. Hence, corruption flourished unchecked.
- Other nations that allowed consolidation across branches eventually faced the same spiral: weakened institutions, normalized abuse, people reduced to spectators.
The lesson is simple: once all powers consolidate under one bloc, accountability evaporates.
V. CHIZ’S PARTING WORDS: A WARNING TO THE NATION
In his speech stepping down, Escudero dropped a rare bomb:
“We conducted hearings that unearthed corruption on a scale rarely seen before… and yes, the name that cannot be mentioned: Speaker Martin Romualdez and Congressman Zaldy Co.”
It was a parting shot that may yet haunt the halls of power. The Senate dared to name names—and it paid the price.
VI. WHAT NOW? THE PEOPLE’S OPTIONS
So what now? Do we sit back, numbed by cynicism, and hope accountability somehow rises from inside this lock-step alliance?
Or do we recognize the gravity: if all three powers close ranks, the people are the last line of defense.
- Expose relentlessly. Social media must amplify truths hearings dared to uncover before they are buried. And let’s not forget: flood-control kickbacks are just the tip of the iceberg. The real battle is to demand a full audit of the 2025 GAA—every ‘small committee’ maneuver, every hidden insertion, the entire architecture of corruption laid bare.
- Peaceful vigilance. Organized assemblies, people’s forums, and watchdog coalitions must reclaim the ground that institutions abandoned.
- International spotlight. Historical precedent shows regimes consolidate only when they think the world isn’t watching. Global scrutiny is leverage.
VII. THE CLOCK IS TICKING
The House has been named. The Senate has fallen in line. Malacañang remains untouched. When all three powers lock arms to protect each other, democracy is not safe—it is hostage.
Kung mananahimik ang bayan, dictatorship will not arrive with tanks. It will arrive wearing barongs, waving gavels, and smiling on livestreams.
The question is no longer whether corruption is real. The question is whether the Filipino people still have the courage to act before democracy slips away.
•••
OPINION | BY ROB RANCES
Disclaimer: This foresight analysis does not accuse specific individuals of crimes and avoids libel or sedition. It draws from public hearings, documented testimonies, and historical parallels to provoke reflection and vigilance.
Pinoy Edmonton News 